An Issue :"D

[Namari Lovelle]

I thought I would ask this of all the members:

When do you all think Paineston should have attacked Avaleur?

Originally it was 50-100 years ago, but I forgot to specify that, me being me. Now I realized that 50-100 years ago doesnt work anymore. So, please tell me how long ago Paineston should have destroyed Avaleur

[Phillis Von Christ]

lol Well I thought it was like.. a continuous hate between the two. Where Paineston was the mean-older-brother-type. They could have attacked more than once? The first time 50-100 years ago, and then after a treaty between the two, Paineston betrayed them (for whatever reason? Maybe to dominate them for more land but it was a failed attempt or something?) and that's why the attack 15-or-so years ago was such a shock and left them in such a slump.

Idk xD

[Ryn]

Phillis has the right idea.
There should definitely be uneasy tension between the Democratic city of Avaleur and the monarchy of Painston.

Hey does them seem familiar in history at all lol America vs England anyone?

[Namari Lovelle]

Hmm, so in that timeline when would the castle and part of the city be destroyed? You've got a good idea coming along, Phillis ;D

[Deleted]

i do like phillis's idea. it makes it add more tension between the two, and makes things have more sense.

[Phillis Von Christ]

Uh well, hmm The castle I'd say was done 50-100 years ago, and then part of the city would be 15 years ago. or something lol

[Phillis Von Christ]

Nov 3, 2011 20:49:53 GMT -5 Ryn said:

Hey does them seem familiar in history at all lol America vs England anyone?

LOL I'm terrible at history. XD I'm not sure.